13 Comments
Mar 29Liked by Martine Proctor

Love this, and so true: the details make it pop, and you don't necessarily need a lot of them for it to land. I took a walk on Google Maps streetview one day to narrate a walk a character took... ;)

Expand full comment
Mar 29Liked by Martine Proctor

Good topic and thanks for sharing your experience. Authenticity in fiction can consist of many layers. I find I need only so much “real stuff” to set a foundation, or at least footings to build on. One time I went down the hole big time though, researching about sleazy salespeople selling fallout shelters to people around the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis. That was fun!

Expand full comment
Mar 28Liked by Martine Proctor

Martine,

Great stuff and so true. The real gold is in finding that sweet spot of just enough of that factual accurate information without it becoming a drag on the story.

Expand full comment

Hey, those descriptions of Bosch's treks over the interlocking highways of Los Angeles are priceless! I've had conversations with friends in Southern Cal that consisted of nothing but arguments over which route to take through the greater LA area. And if you get it wrong in a book, a lot of Southern Californians will tell you about it!

Expand full comment
Mar 28Liked by Martine Proctor

If you have 10 stories under your belt all with the same cast of characters, you might have to start researching your own work to keep the continuity accurate.

Expand full comment

Well said. I have spent hours researching a variety of topics from rose cultivars, the history of Ireland, and tectonic plates, to how chocolate is grown and made. It's all just brain fuel, allowing me to write more knowingly on a scene. The catch is going overboard (I had to dump the excess stuff I had put in about rose cultivars in the first book of the Freelan series -- roses were a key in the plot but not THAT much - hee!).

Expand full comment
Mar 28·edited Mar 28

Good essay!

Expand full comment